Canadian architectural woodwork is documented to its own standard, and the assumption that it is a regional variant of the American one causes more submittal problems than any other single misunderstanding in this market.
The Architectural Woodwork Manufacturers Association of Canada publishes the standards that govern most Canadian architectural woodwork.
Those standards set their own grade structure, their own construction requirements and their own tolerances. They cover the same territory as the American standards and they resolve it differently in enough places to matter on a submittal.
Not in intent. In the specifics that end up on a drawing.
The practical consequence is simple. A set drawn to the American standard on a Canadian project is not slightly wrong. It is answering a different document.
Worth separating clearly, because it is frequently spoken about as though it were a drawing standard. It is not.
The Guarantee and Inspection Service is a programme. Where a project specifies it, the fabricator registers, and the programme brings obligations around inspection and remedy that persist beyond the drawing stage.
Those obligations carry cost and process implications. They belong in the estimate rather than being discovered after the bid.
What detailing can do is identify that the project specifies it, and report what the specification says about it. What detailing cannot do is register, inspect, guarantee or discharge any part of it.
Answers
Which standard governs, and what it obliges
Scope and questions come back, not a template.
Connect with us!
Let's Talk
"*" indicates required fields